HOW TO MANAGE A PROJECT / PROGRAM UNDERSPEND? 

Posted by Amit Goel on 21st March 2021 

As we are approaching the end of the financial year, some of us might be experiencing underspending in our portfolio/programs/projects. Though underspend does not always reflect unhealthy financial status it also doesn’t call for celebration. Where it is imperative to have appropriate utilization of funds in your projects, it is also important to spend it wisely at the right stage of the life cycle. 

While some find financial management an art, others believe it is a discipline. It is difficult for some and is not everyone’s cup of tea. 

Financial management is one of my favourite subjects and yes, I am talking about cost variance where budgets haven’t been spent as granted or estimated. We may experience this situation in multi-year or large-scale programs/projects. 


Having cash in books is important but are we doing it right? Let’s dive deep into the subject. I follow a four-step approach in my projects -

Step 1: Validate the situation

Step 2: Assess all parameters in your program

Step 3: Recommendations or solutions as per findings from Step 2

Step 4: Implicate solutions and probable outcomes from Step 3

As an experienced project manager, you may recognize that the spend rate of a project cannot be linear. Actions planned for the last stage of your project will not be the same as planned for the initial stages. If you think otherwise, I am keen to learn from your experience.

Validate – Is this really a problem?

A large number of unknowns in the initial stages of the program or the beginning of the financial year call for higher contingency. Depending on where we are in the financial year, the situation decides our strategy.

Assessing all parameters at each stage is equally important. Spend will be different in each quarter in the financial year.

Single page framework that provides recommendations and implications of the probable outcomes

Four-step approach

Assess the following

ENSURE COVERAGE

✓ Paid all vendor outstanding invoices?

✓ Got credit / additional funding?

✓ Is CAPEX vs. OPEX ratio is not in line?

✓ Is team spending more effort in operations than creating business value?

✓ Missed any important procurement?

✓ Could it be over estimation?

✓ Under resourced? – low capacity or absences?

✓ Team involved in non-project initiatives?

✓ Efficient team? Team has high velocity?

✓ Team shared between the projects?

✓ Team not charging time to correct cost center?

Desired Action

BASED ON THE OUTCOME OF THE ASSESSMENT

➤ Inform suppliers to present outstanding invoices

➤ Adjust in the remaining budget & increase the run rate

➤ Concerning for financial and delivery health of the capability – propose initiative for defect fixes

➤ Revisit the business case and work on resolution

➤ Review by project leadership team and inform the Business Owner

➤ Consider options to increase the run rate

➤ Raise concerns with the resource management team

➤ Consider options to increase the run rate

➤ Work towards forming dedicated teams to accelerate development

➤ Resolve the issues. Track weekly

Recommendations

OPTIONS OF INCREASING THE RUN RATE

✱ Consider following options to increase the run rate -

- Ramp up the team

- Outsource development to other teams or vendors that can quickly deliver

- Work with the resource managers to increase team allocation

✱ Propose initiative to fix defects and clear technical debt

✱ Look for other critical projects deficient of funds in your portfolio?

Probable Outcomes

IMPLICATIONS OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS

❖ Adjust the roadmap Improve / upgrade infrastructure and articulate the benefits

❖ Bring forward next FY profitable initiatives

❖ Possibility of delivering initiatives ignored earlier or moved to low priority

❖ Celebrate the achievements